After discussing the uses of this tool, its reason for integration into classroom instruction should be reviewed. As Ertmer relayed, by introducing ways of utilizing technology which are applicable to lessons right away, teachers can be assisted in using technology (2005). School-wide installation of the Kaizena Shortcut by the administrator is easily possible in under five minutes (Kaizena, n.d.) saving time and making implentation speedy. Another reason for Kaizena's integration could be its non-existent cost. As Johnston stated from her study of school librarians, “The most frequently cited enabler for school librarians’ enacting a leadership role in technology integration was a supportive principal” (2012). What principal is going to argue with a free tool that improves his or her teachers' effectiveness? As Johnston also found, positive relationships between teachers and school librarians promoted the school librarian’s technology leadership position (2012); sharing helpful technology tips, such as the Kaizena Shortcut, with teachers aids in promoting goodwill. Lastly, it is important to remember the importance of providing training in using new technologies. “The value of the equipment lies in the ability of the teacher to use it in a way that enhances instruction, and many teachers won’t be able to do this without adequate support” (Overbay, Mollette, & Vasu, 2011). One may view a shortcut such as Kaizena as simple to use, however, if that is not the case, its benefits could remain untapped.
References
Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development (53)4, 25-39. Retrieved from https://blackboard.sc.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-13049476-dt-content-rid-94287093_2/courses/SLIS761-000-FALL-2019/SLIS761-J30-SPRING-2017_ImportedContent_20170503032859/Making%20the%20Case.pdf
Johnston, M.P. (2012). School librarians as technology integration leaders: Enablers and barriers to leadership enactment. School Library Research, 15. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978840.pdf
Overbay, A., Mollette, M. & Vasu, E.S. (2011). A technology plan: Administrators should keep five lessons in mind as they implement new technology initiatives. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (68)5, 56-59. Retrieved from https://blackboard.sc.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-13049482-dt-content-rid-94287094_2/courses/SLIS761-000-FALL-2019/SLIS761-J30-SPRING-2017_ImportedContent_20170503032859/Overbay_Technology_plan_that_works.pdf
Kaizena (n.d.). Features. Retrieved from https://www.kaizena.com/features/voice-comments
Kaizen (n.d.). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/kaizen
I am all for shortening times, yet providing critical feedback. With English, and all of the writing that needs to be graded, I can see this as being very beneficial. Many times several students make the same errors (sentence fragments, punctuation, citation) To be able to send this message to multiple students instead of hand writing over and over and over again the same message makes it an incredible tool.
ReplyDeleteI think this could be very beneficial for several reasons:
ReplyDelete1) It gets kids writing/typing which is more than likely how they will be assessed in the future
2) It cuts down on the grading/paper piles that are created by paper and pencil writing
3) Students are always more engaged when the teacher does something "new" even if it is leaving comments about their grammar usage on a research paper
Thanks for sharing!
In our PBL school of study within a larger school, we have been using a proprietary platform for students. One of the huge sellers of this platform is the ability to offer feedback through video or links. In a year, the grant that funded the purchase will run out. I think this may just be the viable option we need to enhance Google Classrooms and with minimal or no fees. I am always impressed with the options out there. Thank you for showing us this extension!
ReplyDelete