Friday, September 20, 2019

This week I will identify and assess another blog post describing how leadership in technology can be conveyed through an educational concept in the content area of English Language Arts (ELA). The resource of interest is the Google extension, Kaizena Shortcut, previously referred to as the Kaizena Mini, which enables educators to offer students efficient and insightful feedback. Read about on an  Integrating Technology and Literacy Edutopia blog post, this extension enables teachers to provide students recorded verbal comments and place writing lesson links within their submitted work. The inserted links may be in the format of a readily available instructional YouTube video or recorded teacher created lesson, saving the instructor’s time of repeating the same corrections throughout the paper and/or among multiple students. According to English teacher Katherine Cozens’ testimony, “It’s reduced my marking time by 40%” (Kaizena, n.d.). As Kaizena's website describes, the shortcut would especially aid the communication necessary between teacher and students during long term project-based assignments by keeping them focused during the extended timeframe (Kaizema, n.d.); the communication works both ways, students can also communicate with their teachers this way. Not only can the Kaizena Shortcut be used for grading ELA assignments, it can help teachers grade other subjects' online assignment submissions, such as science or geography, as well – an “improvement” (Kaizen, n.d.) to the old pen and paper way, indeed.

After discussing the uses of this tool, its reason for integration into classroom instruction should be reviewed. As Ertmer relayed, by introducing ways of utilizing technology which are applicable to lessons right away, teachers can be assisted in using technology (2005). School-wide installation of the Kaizena Shortcut by the administrator is easily possible in under five minutes (Kaizena, n.d.) saving time and making implentation speedy. Another reason for Kaizena's integration could be its non-existent cost. As Johnston stated from her study of school librarians, “The most frequently cited enabler for school librarians’ enacting a leadership role in technology integration was a supportive principal” (2012). What principal is going to argue with a free tool that improves his or her teachers' effectiveness? As Johnston also found, positive relationships between teachers and school librarians promoted the school librarian’s technology leadership position (2012); sharing helpful technology tips, such as the Kaizena Shortcut, with teachers aids in promoting goodwill. Lastly, it is important to remember the importance of providing training in using new technologies. “The value of the equipment lies in the ability of the teacher to use it in a way that enhances instruction, and many teachers won’t be able to do this without adequate support” (Overbay, Mollette, & Vasu, 2011). One may view a shortcut such as Kaizena as simple to use, however, if that is not the case, its benefits could remain untapped.


References

Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development (53)4, 25-39. Retrieved from https://blackboard.sc.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-13049476-dt-content-rid-94287093_2/courses/SLIS761-000-FALL-2019/SLIS761-J30-SPRING-2017_ImportedContent_20170503032859/Making%20the%20Case.pdf

Johnston, M.P. (2012). School librarians as technology integration leaders: Enablers and barriers to leadership enactment. School Library Research, 15. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978840.pdf

Overbay, A., Mollette, M. & Vasu, E.S. (2011). A technology plan: Administrators should keep five lessons in mind as they implement new technology initiatives. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (68)5, 56-59. Retrieved from https://blackboard.sc.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-13049482-dt-content-rid-94287094_2/courses/SLIS761-000-FALL-2019/SLIS761-J30-SPRING-2017_ImportedContent_20170503032859/Overbay_Technology_plan_that_works.pdf

Kaizena (n.d.). Features. Retrieved from https://www.kaizena.com/features/voice-comments

Kaizen (n.d.). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/kaizen


Friday, September 13, 2019


In this blog post I will discuss the way this week’s class readings, resources and podcast have informed my understanding of the interconnectedness of information literacy, technology and digital/media concepts. Only fairly recently did I comprehend the true understanding of information literacy as defined in the Framework for Information Literacy (http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework) as “the set of integrated abilities encompassing the reflective discovery of information, the understanding of how information is produced and valued, and the use of information in creating new knowledge and participating ethically in communities of learning” (ALA, 2015). My information evolution began a year ago in the University of South Carolina’s Library and Information Science program. During my first semester class, Introduction to Libraries and Information Studies, I learned of the ways and importance of locating and using information from credible and accurate sources, the necessity of proper attribution, and the importance of respecting intellectual rights.


This information literacy knowledge will serve as the foundation of my teaching path as a future elementary school media specialist. As a teacher librarian I will not only be preparing my students to understand how to responsibly access, interpret, and use information for school purposes, but how to methodically address and deal with situations in their future professional and personal lives. Working with a resistant second grade reader until the correct media is located that encourages her reading interest (print book – no, e-reader - no, audiobook - yes!) teaches that young student that one often must try multiple options before finding a solution to a situation. Being an effective school leader will require the skills of critical thinking, communication, and collaboration described in the P21 Framework for 21st Century Learning (file:///C:/Users/m_gra/OneDrive/USC%20MLIS/761%20-%20Fall%202019%20Info.%20Tech%20in%20Sch%20Library/Module%203/Blog%202/P21%20Framework.pdf).


Call me odd in this day and age, but my own information diet from a social media perspective is lacking. On a personal level, I have been resistant to social media as I have been entirely too busy over the past 14 years raising my four sons as a stay at home mom. Besides the responsibilities of parenthood, I have chosen to spend what little free time I do have experiencing life in the here and now, volunteering in my community, reading (print) books, exercising, and getting together with friends, as opposed to spending much time online. Some may question, how do I keep in touch with people and the world, and my response is the old-fashioned way, with a phone call; I have no interest in pop culture and if I want to watch the news, I turn on the TV. With that said, I appreciate social media and the benefits technology has allotted our world and think they can have great benefits in a school setting. Therefore, I understand the importance of keeping abreast of information happenings as a future school media specialist. I envision my job will be to teach students how to properly access quality information online. I may be responsible for teaching teachers how to update their websites, assist staff members with minor technical issues, and promote the school through digital media. While I may lack some skills to do these tasks now, I anticipate with continued schooling and experience in my new job as a school media clerk to be prepared as a future school's well rounded information leader.  





References:

ALA (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Friday, September 6, 2019


The article Engaging Adolescent Literacies With The Standards discusses the impact school media specialists can have beyond the library in improving students’ literacy education through the use of teaching “multimodal literacies” (Spiering, 2019). (To learn more about multimodal literacies, visit: https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/english/literacy/multimodal/Pages/default.aspx.) These varied modes of learning information are based on “adolescent literacy” or literacy’s progression from school children’s traditional writing and reading to today’s necessity of interpreting and communicating virtually (Spiering, 2019). The article discusses the connection between these literacies and the  American Association of School Libraries’ (AASL) standards (file:///C:/Users/m_gra/OneDrive/USC%20MLIS/761%20-%20Fall%202019%20Info.%20Tech%20in%20Sch%20Library/Module%202/Blog%201/AASL%20Standards%202017%20Chart%20.pdf) which have many points in common with the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) standards (https://www.iste.org/standards). Both sets of standards encourage critical thinking, encourage ethical behavior, are pro-creativity and innovation and are proponents of communication. Similarly, both standards encourage seeking varied perspectives in multiple formats while obtaining and analyzing information, and each promote connecting previously learned information to new learning opportunities. 
However, there are areas where the two standards are not aligned. The AASL standards, in an effort to further librarians’ depth of knowledge, encourages reading extensively both personally and professionally. It also champions drawing conclusions, instructs finding appropriate resources, and encourages writing expression. As Ms. Spiering asserts in her article, the benefits students obtain through reading the multimodal graphic novel can be extended in creating writing responses in another format or mode (Spiering, 2019). (Read here for more information on children’s benefits of reading graphic novels: https://www.scholastic.com/parents/books-and-reading/raise-a-reader-blog/raising-super-readers-benefits-comic-books-and-graphic-novels.print.html).
Meanwhile, the ISTE standards encourage students to use digital tools to “locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, [and] synthesize” information, and leverage these tools to offer distance collaboration, communication and learning opportunities (NJASL, 2010). Relevant to these skills, Ms. Spiering’s article discusses how school media specialists can help students understand how the social media modalities of “images, memes, tweets, [and] videos” can influence viewers’ feelings (Spiering, 2019). (To learn how emoticons affect our communication, see https://www.psychologistworld.com/emotion/emoticons-emojis-emotion-psychology). As expected, the ISTE standards provide a more in-depth focus on technology while AASL, a division of the American Library Association, standards are geared more toward information discovery in its traditional sense, but the similarities between the two sets of standards outweigh the differences. 
Reference

Spiering, J. (2019). Engaging Adolescent Literacies With The Standards. Knowledge Quest, (47)5, 44-47.  Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.pallas2.tcl.sc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=27ad8d08-f1fe-44e8-912e-d751af574f6a%40sessionmgr102

NJASL Professional Development Committee 2010 (2010). NJASL Standards Comparison Chart. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/m_gra/OneDrive/USC%20MLIS/761%20-%20Fall%202019%20Info.%20Tech%20in%20Sch%20Library/Module%202/Blog%201/NJStandardsComparison6-8.pdf